OK so I'm talking about the newest Twilight drama, okay?? Basically, Rachelle Leferve, who played Victoria in the movies, was recast. Bryce Dallas Howard is now playing Victoria in Eclipse. And now, surprise, the recasting was not amicable. Swiped from
ohnotheydidnt:
Summit Entertainment has just issued its statement regarding Rachelle Lefevre's earlier interview concerning the casting change initiated for The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (bringing in Bryce Dallas Howard for the role of Victoria after Lefevre portrayed the character in Twilight and The Twilight Saga: New Moon).
Say they,
We at Summit Entertainment are disappointed by Rachelle Lefevre’s recent comments which attempt to make her career choices the fault of the Studio. Her decision to discuss her version of the scheduling challenges publicly has forced the Studio to set the record straight and correct the facts.
* Ms. Lefevre's representatives were advised as early as April that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE was expected to start shooting in early August.
*If Ms. Lefevre was, as she describes “passionate,” about being part of THE TWILIGHT SAGA, we feel that she and her representatives would have included us in her decision to work on another film that would conflict with the shooting schedule of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.
*It was not until July 20th that Summit was first informed of Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to BARNEY’S VERSION, a commitment we have since been advised she accepted in early June. Summit had acted in good faith that she would be available to fulfill her obligations both in terms of rehearsals and shooting availability for THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE. We feel that her choice to withhold her scheduling conflict information from us can be viewed as a lack of cooperative spirit which affected the entire production.
*Furthermore Ms. Lefevre took a role in the other film that places her in Europe during the required rehearsal time, and at least ten days of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE’s principal photography. This period is essential for both rehearsal time with the cast, and for filming at key locations that are only available during the initial part of production.
*Contrary to Ms. Lefevre’s statement, it is simply untrue that the Studio dismissed her over a ten day overlap. It is not about a ten day overlap, but instead about the fact that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE is an ensemble production that has to accommodate the schedules of numerous actors while respecting the established creative vision of the filmmaker and most importantly the story.
The fact remains that Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to the other project - which she chose to withhold from Summit until the last possible moment - makes her unfortunately unavailable to perform the role of Victoria in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.
***
So because it's Summit we're dealing with here, I smell bullshit asap. I don't really care about the series, but hen again, it's fun to point out everything that sucks about the production, so here we go: some responses to the same post at
ohnotheydidnt that sum up my feelings:
mellinator
2009-07-30 05:30 am
How could they recast her?! SHE'S THE ONE WITH THE WICKED CURVE BALL!!!!
gossipgirll25
2009-07-30 05:59 am
so they found out about the schedualing conflict Monday and by Wed shes already recast? I dont think it works that fast. Oviously they had to know ahead of time that they wanted to replace her. Just drawing up the contracts, finding someone theyre intrested in, having that person audition, ect...will take more then just 2 days.
I dont believe a word Summit says.
justmyowl
2009-07-30 06:18 am
they shouldn't have replaced her. i remember they arranged a special schedule for cam gigandet because he had scheduling conflict, soo they should have tried to do it for her. laaaammee.
Now my two cents:
No way would Rachelle not tell summit about her role in another movie, since it's been stated that she's passionate about her role in the twilight series. Not to mention, Twilight would mean more media coverage for her, meaning her career would be given a bigger boost than if she appeared in an indie flick. Summit never asked Rachelle if she was more devoted to her other role and then go and recast. They "learned" about her scheduling conflict and conveniently were able to recast her role with a star in a matter of 3 days or something. If they had actually talked to Rachelle first and had the intent o keeping her, I'm sure they would have worked something out. Clearly Summit did some dirty underhanded crap. Shame on them; he movies suck anyway. No many how many stars they have, the fact remains that the source material is trash.
Posted via LiveJournal.app.